Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-26 12:54:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED02301DDA79DBD33F461A6044922C5627562F7E178F44000A27684833F5564E
Participant Details

Original Note:

All evidence for the potential superconductor mentioned in this thread (LK-99) is based off a pre-print of a paper that has not been published nor has passed peer review. Many researchers in the field are highly skeptical. https://twitter.com/drjolatunji/status/1684074799918911489?s=46&t=WpCYrDscDQyZdRwhK-_b8w

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684096617547169795
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED02301DDA79DBD33F461A6044922C5627562F7E178F44000A27684833F5564E
  • createdAtMillis - 1690376057637
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1684096617547169795ED02301DDA79DBD33F461A6044922C5627562F7E178F44000A27684833F5564E