Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 20:25:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 357DD001B35D8DF330847084EBB6675A768B6B7B35DD0170AC739B20097122C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

All evidence for the potential superconductor mentioned in this thread (LK-99) is based off a pre-print of a paper that has not been published nor has passed peer review. Many researchers in the field are highly skeptical. https://twitter.com/drjolatunji/status/1684074799918911489?s=46&t=WpCYrDscDQyZdRwhK-_b8w

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684096617547169795
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 357DD001B35D8DF330847084EBB6675A768B6B7B35DD0170AC739B20097122C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1691267132744
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1684096617547169795357DD001B35D8DF330847084EBB6675A768B6B7B35DD0170AC739B20097122C4