Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-26 18:18:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5AECAFFCA255B844259D0E0FF4E7BDBD0365FF8BD8C44E3C9153F6BB6E08A159
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, author cites a peer reviewed scientific study that supports the conclusion other studies have also reached. Previous note is an ad hom attack not in good faith and is unworthy of a community note. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467278/#:~:text=The%20relative%20risk%20(RR)%20for,%2D2.65%2C%20vaccine%20group).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684043749456769024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5AECAFFCA255B844259D0E0FF4E7BDBD0365FF8BD8C44E3C9153F6BB6E08A159
  • createdAtMillis - 1690395506562
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16840437494567690245AECAFFCA255B844259D0E0FF4E7BDBD0365FF8BD8C44E3C9153F6BB6E08A159