Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-25 14:19:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA742E6FEEE702994D73F0B049168A543C6A498C95C6ECF74FA2FFC6CBFEDBF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該ツイートは国際機関である「IAEA」の検証を受けていないと言っているのであり、日本の「原子力規制庁」が検証しているという指摘はツイートの趣旨と関連が無い。ノートは不要である。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1683839132165087232
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA742E6FEEE702994D73F0B049168A543C6A498C95C6ECF74FA2FFC6CBFEDBF8
  • createdAtMillis - 1690294791571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1683839132165087232FA742E6FEEE702994D73F0B049168A543C6A498C95C6ECF74FA2FFC6CBFEDBF8