Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-24 23:00:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C12AF444FE50E79E7A7FFF49C85BAD081F6B9DDF4E2330ADF039CE161647B6FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

CNs below not needed. Kari Lake said the judge had been "explicitly stating" this to her attorney. That's not interpretation. This makes it a claimed statement of fact and not an opinion. Which can be CN'ed. Her claims are used in lawsuits which are supposed to be fact based. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/explicitly

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1683502699558625281
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C12AF444FE50E79E7A7FFF49C85BAD081F6B9DDF4E2330ADF039CE161647B6FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1690239642495
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1683502699558625281C12AF444FE50E79E7A7FFF49C85BAD081F6B9DDF4E2330ADF039CE161647B6FA