Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-24 15:45:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0E6FB53DE0516AE119365992AA28A5682E7175E5C243FBAA147D317CABBCE55
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is just an opinion on what the judge meant when he explicity stated that sanctions (page 9) should only be used for egregious violations in order to deter future violations. Opinions and disagreements of opinions belong in the comments. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1294569/gov.uscourts.azd.1294569.133.0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1683496080804020227
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0E6FB53DE0516AE119365992AA28A5682E7175E5C243FBAA147D317CABBCE55
  • createdAtMillis - 1690213517388
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1683496080804020227D0E6FB53DE0516AE119365992AA28A5682E7175E5C243FBAA147D317CABBCE55