Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-25 03:34:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C2E182ADC30D88724A102B9F82B306AF57F8E81ECFE539AEB013BF18A907EF3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is just an opinion on what the judge meant when he explicity stated that sanctions (page 9) should only be used for egregious violations in order to deter future violations. Opinions and disagreements of opinions belong in the comments. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1294569/gov.uscourts.azd.1294569.133.0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1683496080804020227
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9C2E182ADC30D88724A102B9F82B306AF57F8E81ECFE539AEB013BF18A907EF3
  • createdAtMillis - 1690256047747
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16834960808040202279C2E182ADC30D88724A102B9F82B306AF57F8E81ECFE539AEB013BF18A907EF3