Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-26 18:00:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6EDA5ED8F730598283ACA8B42E0AFB7DCBC2AB8610FFCFB676F765038DA81C39
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is just an opinion on what the judge meant when he explicity stated that sanctions (page 9) should only be used for egregious violations in order to deter future violations. Opinions and disagreements of opinions belong in the comments. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1294569/gov.uscourts.azd.1294569.133.0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1683496080804020227
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6EDA5ED8F730598283ACA8B42E0AFB7DCBC2AB8610FFCFB676F765038DA81C39
createdAtMillis - 1690394401128
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16834960808040202276EDA5ED8F730598283ACA8B42E0AFB7DCBC2AB8610FFCFB676F765038DA81C39