Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-23 17:36:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00760580B601548E20CC727C0276378A1334A96D9D501E3ED389D5E47F5A108D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le Conseil de Déontologie Journalistique et de Méditation est une association. L'ACRIMED, ainsi que plusieurs journalistes ont remis en cause son indépendance: https://www.acrimed.org/Pourquoi-Acrimed-ne-rejoindra-pas-le-Conseil-de https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/tribune-le-conseil-de-deontologie-journalistique-est-un-piege-03-12-2019-2351164_23.php#11

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1683130795223924736
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 00760580B601548E20CC727C0276378A1334A96D9D501E3ED389D5E47F5A108D
createdAtMillis - 1690133760105
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 168313079522392473600760580B601548E20CC727C0276378A1334A96D9D501E3ED389D5E47F5A108D