Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-23 06:21:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B25F60A2833E2924B34E5F2E61348A902AEB794EF9E4A87CEA36D9F9E3C7C919
Participant Details

Original Note:

SARS-CoV-2の起源については、自然起源説と人工ウイルスの研究所流出説があり、未だに結論は出ていません。 現時点で人工ウイルスがほぼ確実とはいえないことに注意が必要です。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20230624-HRZOVWCCDJMAFBWGMV3PLGNCGM/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682808948083261440
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B25F60A2833E2924B34E5F2E61348A902AEB794EF9E4A87CEA36D9F9E3C7C919
  • createdAtMillis - 1690093277451
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1682808948083261440B25F60A2833E2924B34E5F2E61348A902AEB794EF9E4A87CEA36D9F9E3C7C919