Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-23 04:41:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B14E1BF8610493B10F0ADFEC85A79FCF8E42EC628603B6187AB9A19CAF63C954
Participant Details

Original Note:

SARS-CoV-2の起源については、自然起源説と人工ウイルスの研究所流出説があり、未だに結論は出ていません。 現時点で人工ウイルスがほぼ確実とはいえないことに注意が必要です。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20230624-HRZOVWCCDJMAFBWGMV3PLGNCGM/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682808948083261440
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B14E1BF8610493B10F0ADFEC85A79FCF8E42EC628603B6187AB9A19CAF63C954
  • createdAtMillis - 1690087307529
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1682808948083261440B14E1BF8610493B10F0ADFEC85A79FCF8E42EC628603B6187AB9A19CAF63C954