Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-22 18:18:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58514F9265AB9F5ADA270966706304FB29510269E6E06FDFC968E225196AC279
Participant Details

Original Note:

SARS-CoV-2の起源については、自然起源説と人工ウイルスの研究所流出説があり、未だに結論は出ていません。 現時点で人工ウイルスがほぼ確実とはいえないことに注意が必要です。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20230624-HRZOVWCCDJMAFBWGMV3PLGNCGM/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682808948083261440
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58514F9265AB9F5ADA270966706304FB29510269E6E06FDFC968E225196AC279
  • createdAtMillis - 1690049921089
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168280894808326144058514F9265AB9F5ADA270966706304FB29510269E6E06FDFC968E225196AC279