Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-22 21:47:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30BA863F03975F6BB616ED51CCE66B0D97C7370DA5E40477D16CB1317EF5BBA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

SARS-CoV-2の起源については、自然起源説と人工ウイルスの研究所流出説があり、未だに結論は出ていません。 現時点で人工ウイルスがほぼ確実とはいえないことに注意が必要です。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20230624-HRZOVWCCDJMAFBWGMV3PLGNCGM/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682808948083261440
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30BA863F03975F6BB616ED51CCE66B0D97C7370DA5E40477D16CB1317EF5BBA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1690062445177
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168280894808326144030BA863F03975F6BB616ED51CCE66B0D97C7370DA5E40477D16CB1317EF5BBA8