Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-22 16:45:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BC12DCACA52490ABA9BD09DC9C9CC61A73E01D5A984E756FC384E0FAA4E056F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Pas sérieux d'écrire une note sur un tweet mettant en lumière un potentiel scandale alimentaire en choisissant comme source appuyant la note un lien vers le site de la marque incriminée. Pas de spéculations svp, en l'absence de contre preuves solides : NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682673887148949505
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BC12DCACA52490ABA9BD09DC9C9CC61A73E01D5A984E756FC384E0FAA4E056F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1690044324497
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1682673887148949505BC12DCACA52490ABA9BD09DC9C9CC61A73E01D5A984E756FC384E0FAA4E056F9