Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-22 10:07:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1334D4F4750C1E14529D69668C42A16E4C77D8798A0EB5D26A17CFF2A260135
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet clearly expresses a legitimate opinion about the purpose and focus of film. It was a creative decision to choose to make a film entirely focusing on Oppenheimer himself, that choice can be criticised.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682651746940727296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1334D4F4750C1E14529D69668C42A16E4C77D8798A0EB5D26A17CFF2A260135
  • createdAtMillis - 1690020433791
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1682651746940727296F1334D4F4750C1E14529D69668C42A16E4C77D8798A0EB5D26A17CFF2A260135