Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-22 08:45:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 852B6E11E49669C51ED6476C3D3CE4F94F3AE12DE3BD273A49CFC2A33FEC8C76
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet clearly expresses a legitimate opinion about the purpose and focus of film. It was a creative decision to choose to make a film entirely focusing on Oppenheimer himself, that choice can be criticised.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682651746940727296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 852B6E11E49669C51ED6476C3D3CE4F94F3AE12DE3BD273A49CFC2A33FEC8C76
  • createdAtMillis - 1690015551297
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1682651746940727296852B6E11E49669C51ED6476C3D3CE4F94F3AE12DE3BD273A49CFC2A33FEC8C76