Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-22 13:57:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F129A5168BFA5F4331B0665D65B4E744CA795F384C73A8695C5A790CBBE12FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet clearly expresses a legitimate opinion about the purpose and focus of film. It was a creative decision to choose to make a film entirely focusing on Oppenheimer himself, that choice can be criticised.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682651746940727296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F129A5168BFA5F4331B0665D65B4E744CA795F384C73A8695C5A790CBBE12FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1690034222009
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16826517469407272960F129A5168BFA5F4331B0665D65B4E744CA795F384C73A8695C5A790CBBE12FF