Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-22 00:45:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first paragraph of the article says the daughter was charged with "illegally concealing human remains", not abortion. The second describes conspiring to burn the fetal remains. Paragraph five indicates the mother was charged with violating Nebraska’s abortion law. https://archive.is/6RTuL#selection-478.0-484.0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1682522791646490624
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C
createdAtMillis - 1689986709932
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16825227916464906241B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C