Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 17:13:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C6A80D1EEFDC33656426F38A61F77EF45F8F6B032BDC0AFF32F49D961C34011
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes not needed, they are just affirming that the original tweet is in fact correct. Suggested notes also are comparing to global carbon emissions while the study and tweet is only counting UK carbon emissions, making them totally incomparable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682437395042410513
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9C6A80D1EEFDC33656426F38A61F77EF45F8F6B032BDC0AFF32F49D961C34011
  • createdAtMillis - 1689959620269
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16824373950424105139C6A80D1EEFDC33656426F38A61F77EF45F8F6B032BDC0AFF32F49D961C34011