Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-22 11:57:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 559A40D6EF85DE44E0A0A73F019ACF945AEEBB7708B7C417FDDD38979E7B73EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes not needed, they are just affirming that the original tweet is in fact correct. Suggested notes also are comparing to global carbon emissions while the study and tweet is only counting UK carbon emissions, making them totally incomparable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682437395042410513
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 559A40D6EF85DE44E0A0A73F019ACF945AEEBB7708B7C417FDDD38979E7B73EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1690027021437
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1682437395042410513559A40D6EF85DE44E0A0A73F019ACF945AEEBB7708B7C417FDDD38979E7B73EB