Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 23:44:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F3297D137C7C114B2557E63D55378B9F17B9325E33B8136639701B348AC954F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes not needed, they are just affirming that the original tweet is in fact correct. Suggested notes also are comparing to global carbon emissions while the study and tweet is only counting UK carbon emissions, making them totally incomparable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682437395042410513
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F3297D137C7C114B2557E63D55378B9F17B9325E33B8136639701B348AC954F
  • createdAtMillis - 1689983070053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16824373950424105134F3297D137C7C114B2557E63D55378B9F17B9325E33B8136639701B348AC954F