Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 19:40:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3ABCD75A1582DE236BC6C45A30D4F7AC3E2A5752C1996DC11A0531A11F109C53
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes not needed, they are just affirming that the original tweet is in fact correct. Suggested notes also are comparing to global carbon emissions while the study and tweet is only counting UK carbon emissions, making them totally incomparable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682437395042410513
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3ABCD75A1582DE236BC6C45A30D4F7AC3E2A5752C1996DC11A0531A11F109C53
  • createdAtMillis - 1689968413969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16824373950424105133ABCD75A1582DE236BC6C45A30D4F7AC3E2A5752C1996DC11A0531A11F109C53