Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 00:12:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B17F9FF7FF1C3F490F88CBF70FA6F33C6B8B3762987BAE70B1A228B8334E74F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The linked article includes comments from various organisations, but it does not present any evidence of qualifications or the reputation of the “experts” referred to in the tweet. The article does confirm Twitter’s claim was based on the opinion of a third party expert. https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/07/20/twitter-hate-speech-drops-experts-disagree/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682093082265657373
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B17F9FF7FF1C3F490F88CBF70FA6F33C6B8B3762987BAE70B1A228B8334E74F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1689898352054
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1682093082265657373B17F9FF7FF1C3F490F88CBF70FA6F33C6B8B3762987BAE70B1A228B8334E74F7