Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 18:35:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3567C08037AB4013C5697D094F1443EF833CE990B279301904E18EBE5DD9E7B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The linked article includes comments from various organisations, but it does not present any evidence of qualifications or the reputation of the “experts” referred to in the tweet. The article does confirm Twitter’s claim was based on the opinion of a third party expert. https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/07/20/twitter-hate-speech-drops-experts-disagree/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682093082265657373
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3567C08037AB4013C5697D094F1443EF833CE990B279301904E18EBE5DD9E7B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1689878144922
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16820930822656573733567C08037AB4013C5697D094F1443EF833CE990B279301904E18EBE5DD9E7B5