Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 01:42:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F465FADA8919666AC07E5E1241AE74E1A79A69639A4F382B00018C40A868F64
Participant Details

Original Note:

The linked article includes comments from various organisations, but it does not present any evidence of qualifications or the reputation of the “experts” referred to in the tweet. The article does confirm Twitter’s claim was based on the opinion of a third party expert. https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/07/20/twitter-hate-speech-drops-experts-disagree/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682093082265657373
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F465FADA8919666AC07E5E1241AE74E1A79A69639A4F382B00018C40A868F64
  • createdAtMillis - 1689903765278
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16820930822656573732F465FADA8919666AC07E5E1241AE74E1A79A69639A4F382B00018C40A868F64