Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 04:47:38 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71EF29328709499F5B9320EC9540957E96ACED59AAB31FB80079828E6B9B7769
Participant Details

Original Note:

特定事項の科学的根拠を厚生労働省に求めてもそのような「行政文書」は存在しないと回答されるのは当然である。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682031930307678214
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71EF29328709499F5B9320EC9540957E96ACED59AAB31FB80079828E6B9B7769
  • createdAtMillis - 1689914858081
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168203193030767821471EF29328709499F5B9320EC9540957E96ACED59AAB31FB80079828E6B9B7769