Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 22:57:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 630E313101D06949BD3907E80EC46586F03D4855A88FC3FB2B813503400F09FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

特定事項の科学的根拠を厚生労働省に求めてもそのような「行政文書」は存在しないと回答されるのは当然である。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682031930307678214
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 630E313101D06949BD3907E80EC46586F03D4855A88FC3FB2B813503400F09FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1689893864953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1682031930307678214630E313101D06949BD3907E80EC46586F03D4855A88FC3FB2B813503400F09FF