Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 18:40:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6D547ADAA467CEA15D6A572BE7BC8538FF31EA20E5C6F140262781DF0FED115
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The tweet isn't arguing points of law, rather it's pointing to the differing attitude of the newspaper to two situations of refusing service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682008498232590337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E6D547ADAA467CEA15D6A572BE7BC8538FF31EA20E5C6F140262781DF0FED115
  • createdAtMillis - 1689878422318
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1682008498232590337E6D547ADAA467CEA15D6A572BE7BC8538FF31EA20E5C6F140262781DF0FED115