Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 00:14:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BAC0E449CA743C02D6458F897E56C77E331F5D25F3118BBD2AF5DF8FF9CFF98
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The tweet isn't arguing points of law, rather it's pointing to the differing attitude of the newspaper to two situations of refusing service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682008498232590337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BAC0E449CA743C02D6458F897E56C77E331F5D25F3118BBD2AF5DF8FF9CFF98
  • createdAtMillis - 1689898457134
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16820084982325903376BAC0E449CA743C02D6458F897E56C77E331F5D25F3118BBD2AF5DF8FF9CFF98