Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 19:57:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A9D16D2C03867DAD31D3EF470B77B2FFB757788CF60AAF7F3C911D2858F9053
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The tweet isn't arguing points of law, rather it's pointing to the differing attitude of the newspaper to two situations of refusing service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682008498232590337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6A9D16D2C03867DAD31D3EF470B77B2FFB757788CF60AAF7F3C911D2858F9053
  • createdAtMillis - 1689883029289
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16820084982325903376A9D16D2C03867DAD31D3EF470B77B2FFB757788CF60AAF7F3C911D2858F9053