Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 14:21:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53F98BBDFB783C8B47F0B292D018D6B646C6A1231DC5063E59DC3919B998DEE6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The tweet isn't arguing points of law, rather it's pointing to the differing attitude of the newspaper to two situations of refusing service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682008498232590337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53F98BBDFB783C8B47F0B292D018D6B646C6A1231DC5063E59DC3919B998DEE6
  • createdAtMillis - 1689862917366
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168200849823259033753F98BBDFB783C8B47F0B292D018D6B646C6A1231DC5063E59DC3919B998DEE6