Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 09:36:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 403D18F90EE3AF7669CC241878960D79672EBC297E9319EE409A8176E0BC6B90
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The tweet isn't arguing points of law, rather it's pointing to the differing attitude of the newspaper to two situations of refusing service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682008498232590337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 403D18F90EE3AF7669CC241878960D79672EBC297E9319EE409A8176E0BC6B90
  • createdAtMillis - 1689932209740
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1682008498232590337403D18F90EE3AF7669CC241878960D79672EBC297E9319EE409A8176E0BC6B90