Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 16:48:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9113EC38C2E3F562047F48D69E85BC649A11A4B804F90BACBAC72947B5F6B1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. According to the linked article in the proposed note claiming to refute the central point, the assailant is said to have believed the woman he was assaulting was secretly a man.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681913266375913472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9113EC38C2E3F562047F48D69E85BC649A11A4B804F90BACBAC72947B5F6B1A
  • createdAtMillis - 1689871720531
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681913266375913472C9113EC38C2E3F562047F48D69E85BC649A11A4B804F90BACBAC72947B5F6B1A