Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 09:25:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5DB6B49657D55E2A73C8E8B37CA9A61E11D0A02ABE0CFA3FB4E37BFEA4C0AC91
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. According to the linked article in the proposed note claiming to refute the central point, the assailant is said to have believed the woman he was assaulting was secretly a man.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681913266375913472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5DB6B49657D55E2A73C8E8B37CA9A61E11D0A02ABE0CFA3FB4E37BFEA4C0AC91
  • createdAtMillis - 1689845150322
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16819132663759134725DB6B49657D55E2A73C8E8B37CA9A61E11D0A02ABE0CFA3FB4E37BFEA4C0AC91