Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-22 01:34:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 458EB562D6FE6FF33B632E2B000E5F625EAF8491E5B84A3E3E2D00E3F4CF6B69
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. According to the linked article in the proposed note claiming to refute the central point, the assailant is said to have believed the woman he was assaulting was secretly a man.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681913266375913472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 458EB562D6FE6FF33B632E2B000E5F625EAF8491E5B84A3E3E2D00E3F4CF6B69
  • createdAtMillis - 1689989659510
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681913266375913472458EB562D6FE6FF33B632E2B000E5F625EAF8491E5B84A3E3E2D00E3F4CF6B69