Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 08:17:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E7068FFA65B404A015211E848DD9E9C81E7EEA1662233C7F1CF4F2D0C6FD1C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. According to the linked article in the proposed note claiming to refute the central point, the assailant is said to have believed the woman he was assaulting was secretly a man.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681913266375913472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E7068FFA65B404A015211E848DD9E9C81E7EEA1662233C7F1CF4F2D0C6FD1C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1689841021234
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16819132663759134722E7068FFA65B404A015211E848DD9E9C81E7EEA1662233C7F1CF4F2D0C6FD1C9