Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 23:11:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 002CE9F3E04AE7DC8B2629A4C755E7120416A9AB7BDF34CE6AB5705C630AB1CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. According to the linked article in the proposed note claiming to refute the central point, the assailant is said to have believed the woman he was assaulting was secretly a man.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681913266375913472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 002CE9F3E04AE7DC8B2629A4C755E7120416A9AB7BDF34CE6AB5705C630AB1CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1689894667117
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681913266375913472002CE9F3E04AE7DC8B2629A4C755E7120416A9AB7BDF34CE6AB5705C630AB1CA