Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 19:47:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFE17A53CA99E5456CFB016320686C2FB673A970A246AB1B5318E5C64981C3A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet’s author is simply expressing a personal opinion. Although the 95% claim is used, readers should debate the stat in a reply. As CN contributors, we should avoid the strong temptation to police public opinion tweets. Let rebuttal and debates occur in replies. https://twitter.github.io/communitynotes/note-examples https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681730526250450976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CFE17A53CA99E5456CFB016320686C2FB673A970A246AB1B5318E5C64981C3A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1689796034701
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681730526250450976CFE17A53CA99E5456CFB016320686C2FB673A970A246AB1B5318E5C64981C3A8