Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 22:25:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3789602CE0753FC47FD1D8BBFC1891F763645395A7A7BC288E97B9C3440D079
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet expresses an opinion about the perceived intent and motives of Dr. Andersen, during and after the publishing of Proximal Origins. Andersen himself has started to walked back the statement "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible" NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681664211489792001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3789602CE0753FC47FD1D8BBFC1891F763645395A7A7BC288E97B9C3440D079
  • createdAtMillis - 1689805559310
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681664211489792001E3789602CE0753FC47FD1D8BBFC1891F763645395A7A7BC288E97B9C3440D079