Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-23 01:45:34 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet expresses an opinion about the perceived intent and motives of Dr. Andersen, during and after the publishing of Proximal Origins. Andersen himself has started to walked back the statement "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible" NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681664211489792001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1690076734796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681664211489792001A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF