Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 04:44:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6342290D68D6675893E39B71EFA0F4D0ED516F7FE7D6FDCE4A5924E8DA17D91D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet expresses an opinion about the perceived intent and motives of Dr. Andersen, during and after the publishing of Proximal Origins. Andersen himself has started to walked back the statement "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible" NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681664211489792001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6342290D68D6675893E39B71EFA0F4D0ED516F7FE7D6FDCE4A5924E8DA17D91D
  • createdAtMillis - 1727585067862
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16816642114897920016342290D68D6675893E39B71EFA0F4D0ED516F7FE7D6FDCE4A5924E8DA17D91D