Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-24 13:52:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A89AFEDC85F8FF062FB5E44AD3373DF9BEA2775BD03455C714BE5ED05B09F9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet expresses an opinion about the perceived intent and motives of Dr. Andersen, during and after the publishing of Proximal Origins. Andersen himself has started to walked back the statement "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible" NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681664211489792001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A89AFEDC85F8FF062FB5E44AD3373DF9BEA2775BD03455C714BE5ED05B09F9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1690206733891
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16816642114897920015A89AFEDC85F8FF062FB5E44AD3373DF9BEA2775BD03455C714BE5ED05B09F9A