Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 17:04:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D79010BA17DC3AAD8BDE82B1F18DDC4D125E3F1E61894717D528EDF266AB954B
Participant Details

Original Note:

CNBC does not claim this ranking is scientific. It’s obviously their opaque opinion. NNN. Also, we in Texas welcome this view because the people we don’t want moving here will believe it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681658137231736832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D79010BA17DC3AAD8BDE82B1F18DDC4D125E3F1E61894717D528EDF266AB954B
  • createdAtMillis - 1689786252888
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681658137231736832D79010BA17DC3AAD8BDE82B1F18DDC4D125E3F1E61894717D528EDF266AB954B