Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 16:38:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3717FEC8578D5E359E3A399B59F0FF56ED6A3625AA26307CEA67D2519084CC4
Participant Details

Original Note:

CNBC does not claim this ranking is scientific. It’s obviously their opaque opinion. NNN. Also, we in Texas welcome this view because the people we don’t want moving here will believe it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681658137231736832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3717FEC8578D5E359E3A399B59F0FF56ED6A3625AA26307CEA67D2519084CC4
  • createdAtMillis - 1689784728065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681658137231736832B3717FEC8578D5E359E3A399B59F0FF56ED6A3625AA26307CEA67D2519084CC4