Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 15:14:46 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8635B2BA04CC5841CB7DC08D55CE2877C520BE44CB9B9F0B6E9AC102D286C66F
Participant Details

Original Note:

CNBC does not claim this ranking is scientific. It’s obviously their opaque opinion. NNN. Also, we in Texas welcome this view because the people we don’t want moving here will believe it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681658137231736832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8635B2BA04CC5841CB7DC08D55CE2877C520BE44CB9B9F0B6E9AC102D286C66F
  • createdAtMillis - 1689779686993
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16816581372317368328635B2BA04CC5841CB7DC08D55CE2877C520BE44CB9B9F0B6E9AC102D286C66F