Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 19:31:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4ABE6203F10279A89C2A3C09E70B746A68D327698E0FC5F06B79365FFE86469B
Participant Details

Original Note:

CNBC does not claim this ranking is scientific. It’s obviously their opaque opinion. NNN. Also, we in Texas welcome this view because the people we don’t want moving here will believe it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681658137231736832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4ABE6203F10279A89C2A3C09E70B746A68D327698E0FC5F06B79365FFE86469B
  • createdAtMillis - 1689795096686
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16816581372317368324ABE6203F10279A89C2A3C09E70B746A68D327698E0FC5F06B79365FFE86469B