Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-20 13:21:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 19F9F28D611A6DAB27C4C8357B85623AADF6CC4425C031145A4CFD166F3ED89F
Participant Details

Original Note:

CNBC does not claim this ranking is scientific. It’s obviously their opaque opinion. NNN. Also, we in Texas welcome this view because the people we don’t want moving here will believe it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681658137231736832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 19F9F28D611A6DAB27C4C8357B85623AADF6CC4425C031145A4CFD166F3ED89F
  • createdAtMillis - 1689859268341
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168165813723173683219F9F28D611A6DAB27C4C8357B85623AADF6CC4425C031145A4CFD166F3ED89F