Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 16:29:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71743BDDBFD4AF3170EADB531A5EB902E9417840930309739866F3D7F9C129F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

A jornalista caracteriza como um ataque ao ministro um fato que ainda está sendo apurado,apresentando uma alegação não verificada como se fosse um fato Além disso ela apoia que a investigação subsequente deva servir como punição a um determinado grupo político (desvio de função)https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/poderes-do-juiz-e-principio-da-imparcialidade/112230058

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681591401983746050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71743BDDBFD4AF3170EADB531A5EB902E9417840930309739866F3D7F9C129F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1689784188364
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168159140198374605071743BDDBFD4AF3170EADB531A5EB902E9417840930309739866F3D7F9C129F9