Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 13:04:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF466972862EFFEFF4EBB376394D5B2C21A125DF0258A4CD5F946FE0C3A65395
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note states there is no hard evidence of fraud, but fails to note that there is no evidence that proves definitively that there was no fraud. That leaves this tweet in the realm of opinion, and does not need a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681457896490696711
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF466972862EFFEFF4EBB376394D5B2C21A125DF0258A4CD5F946FE0C3A65395
  • createdAtMillis - 1689771873274
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681457896490696711EF466972862EFFEFF4EBB376394D5B2C21A125DF0258A4CD5F946FE0C3A65395