Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 01:04:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4ADC16179F4DEF2B34251F224F8FF14DB1F86E32C69DCEA78A1F25E74CC5E6E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note states there is no hard evidence of fraud, but fails to note that there is no evidence that proves definitively that there was no fraud. That leaves this tweet in the realm of opinion, and does not need a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681457896490696711
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4ADC16179F4DEF2B34251F224F8FF14DB1F86E32C69DCEA78A1F25E74CC5E6E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1689728699027
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16814578964906967114ADC16179F4DEF2B34251F224F8FF14DB1F86E32C69DCEA78A1F25E74CC5E6E9